Presenter screen
Live participant responses
Results update automatically as participants answer on their own devices. Project this page; participants do not see the tallies on the activity pages.
Waiting for the first response…
Activity: allowed, grey zone, or not allowed?
Asking Claude to critique the logic of a Discussion section you wrote yourself.
Asking ChatGPT to 'give me 10 recent references on this topic' and pasting them in directly.
Uploading your unpublished manuscript to a free AI tool to polish the abstract.
Using AI to generate an extra 30 survey responses because your N is too small.
Listing ChatGPT as a co-author because it 'wrote a lot'.
Using Gemini Notebook (NotebookLM) to summarise 25 PDFs you have already downloaded and read.
Wrap-up self-check
1. A colleague asks ChatGPT for 10 references on her topic and pastes them into her draft. What is the main risk?
2. Which of these is the safest and highest-value use of AI in a literature review?
3. Your sample is smaller than planned. Which action is research misconduct?
4. Can a generative AI tool be listed as a co-author?
5. When should you write your own rough draft?